content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
It seems that all (well, almost all :) of BEAM tech has focused on 4 feet, =
6 feet, 1 foot (symet) etc. I was just wunderin why isn't there any bipeds?=
(walkers, and no wheels)
I know it's a bit harder, but the main problem is just the balancing. =
So, this is my idea:
1. Have 2 legs,both that go up and down at diffrent times.
2. A motor to put one leg forward while its up (lets call it retracted) and=
when it's down (deployed), use it as the fulcrum (is it fulcrum?) to push =
the other leg forward, which is retracted and etc (I hope you get me :)
3. Lastly, another motor that drives a weight (preferably the batt., circui=
t etc) from the extreme left to the extreme right to counterbalance the leg=
that is retracted =
( I also hope that this is clear)
Anyway, with some imagination i'm sure you could visualise it.
Is it feasable? I know i should have tried it out but i have just done the =
legs and i can't wait. (Hectic schedule)
It does not resemble nature in that we move our legs to the centre of balan=
ce =
but this bot moves the center of balance TO the legs
(If you still can't visualize it, think Mechwarrior III)
If it's feasable, please help me think of a suitable circuit. (mebbe 8nv uc=
ore?)
content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
>
lance =
the leg that is retracted
( I also hope that this is clear)
Anyway, with some imagination i'm sure you could visual=
ise =
it.
Is it feasable? I know i should h=
ave tried =
it out but i have just done the legs and i can't wait. (Hectic =
schedule)
It does not resemble nature in that we move our legs to=
the =
centre of balance
but this bot moves the center of balance TO the =
legs
(If you still can't visualize it, think Mechwarrior =
III)
If it's feasable, please help me think of a suitable ci=
rcuit. =
(mebbe 8nv ucore?)
Home