Alt-BEAM Archive
Message #12015
To: beam@sgiblab.sgi.com
From: Jean auBois aubois@trail.com
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 01:03:31 -0700
Subject: [alt-beam] Re: A little irrelevant..................
At 11:17 PM 3/16/00 -0800, Dane Gardner wrote:
...
>One that allows the more advanced
>BEAMer's a chance to discuss their passions and thoughts without having to
>stop and explain the basics in order to talk about the advanced stuff. We
>seem to have hit a brick wall with developments lately.
...
> when they
>should be using that biological neural net for something that pushes it's
>limit. Think about the future, not perpetually reviewing the past.
...
>Yes, I think that an 'ADVANCED' BEAM mailing list would
>be a good solution to the problem, but how are we going to determine who
>gets on it? Set up a test? Or go by who has been here the longest? Or
>just allow anybody on...but refuse to answer the 'basic' questions? How do
>you segregate (bad word, but the only one I can think of) the two? How do
>we discern who is worthy and who is new? Either way...if someone wants to
>start one up, I'll be there on the front line!
take out ALL of *'s that might permit this message to get to the list:
P*o*s*t M*e*s*s*a*g*e spinalcolumn@eGroups.com
S*u*b*s*c*r*ib*e spinalcolumn-s*u*b*s*c*r*i*b*e@eGroups.com
U*n*s*u*b*s*c*r*i*b*e spinalcolumn-u*n*s*u*b*s*c*r*i*b*e@eGroups.com
L*i*s*t o*w*n*e*r spinalcolumn-owner@eGroups.com
It started in May of 1999 but there really hasn't been much traffic since
July of 1999.
Home