Alt-BEAM Archive

Message #11749



To: beam@sgiblab.sgi.com
From: Bruce Robinson Bruce_Robinson@telus.net
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 17:38:05 -0800
Subject: [alt-beam] Re: Zenbot


Wilf Rigter wrote:
>
> ... It reminded me of an old sci-fi story about Tibetan monks using a
> computer to print out all the names of God, speeding many centuries'
> of work with pen and ink to completion in a matter of days and then
> the universe winked out.

"The Nine Billion Names of God", Arthur C. Clark, 19??"

Bruce



11750 Mon, 13 Mar 2000 17:36:42 -0800 (PST) [alt-beam] Re: Turbots beam@sgiblab.sgi.com Max Inggal Well for the turbot I'm building I used little
Mcdonald toy gear boxes. I hook up a pager motor to
it and works great. I have a 1 arm turbot crawling
around in my RJP. But I am am building a 2 armed one
now. My tip is try a 1 arm first than move up in
complexity by going 2 arms. Besides the 1 arm one
won't kill any of your bots. =)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com



11751 Friday, March 10, 2000 10:05 PM Re: lobster (BEAMlife) beam@sgiblab.sgi.com Verne & Catherine Rambaud
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Timothy Flytch
>To: beam@sgiblab.sgi.com
>Date: Thursday, March 09, 2000 1:32 AM
>Subject: Re: lobster (BEAMlife)
>
>
>>>
>>>>Wow Verne , you mean our lives have meaning???
>>Cool... So could you clue me in???
>>
>>i decre you shall be a doctor
>>______________________________________________________
>>


11752 Mon, 13 Mar 2000 17:39:56 -0800 (PST) [alt-beam] Re: Fang's Photovore Plans beam@sgiblab.sgi.com Max Inggal
For my free former photovore I used the 1 turn pot.
It's a lot better only because you can tune your bot
really quick(in a half a turn or so). It's alot
better than turnning and then testing your bot using a
20 or so trimpot.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com



11753 Sun, 12 Mar 2000 13:20:30 -0500 Re: numeric symbol for a .1pf ceramic cap Richard Piotter
> I was thinking 1pf. I spoke before (direct mail). The .1pf instructions
> were from a web page that was hastily written, and does not follow the
> standard procedure for turboing calculators. a .1pf cap isn't even
> needed. As said before, wire and such can do the same task, for that
> particular upgrade anyway.
>
> Of course, Radio Shack don't sell .1pf caps. I was going bby memory of
> the original upgrade plans, that calls for a 1 pf. Oops.
>
> John Bachman wrote:
> >
> > At 10:42 AM 2/29/00 , you wrote:
> > >Not avaliable my foot! Even Radio Shack sels them!!!
> >
> > The question was about a 0.1pf. That is an order of magnitude from 12pf
or 15pf or 8pf.
> >
> > John
>
> --
>
>
> Richard Piotter The Richfiles Robotics & TI web page:
> richfile@rconnect.com http://richfiles.calc.org
>
> -- Make Money by Simply Surfing the Net or responding to E-Mail!!!
> -- Click below!!!
>
> http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=ATL147
> http://www.spedia.net/cgi-bin/dir/tz.cgi?run=show_svc&fl=8&vid=329630
>

Home