Alt-BEAM Archive

Message #09235



To: beam@sgiblab.sgi.com beam@sgiblab.sgi.com
From: Seamus Allan seamus_allan@inet.net.nz
Date: Sunday, 16 January 2000 11:09
Subject: small, cheap nv board


=

I think David Perry is onto two completely different things. First of a=
ll, a suggestion was made for a small ciruit board for an nv net, possibly =
DIP, for breadboards, now it has snowballed into small circuit boards a LOT=
like hextiles. I personally would prefer small experimentation boards (but=
thats just my humble opinion), and use/modify the already existing hextile=
s. This would probably be easier and cheaper.
By the way, I was just wondering, is it a violation of the patent to se=
ll these boards????


content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable





DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
x">
-----Original Message-----
<=
B>From: =

Seamus Allan <
href=3D"mailto:seamus_allan@inet.net.nz">seamus_allan@inet.net.nz&g=
t;
To: =

beam@sgiblab.sgi.com &l=
t;
href=3D"mailto:beam@sgiblab.sgi.com">beam@sgiblab.sgi.com>
>Date: =

Sunday, 16 January 2000 11:09
Subject: small, cheap nv =

board


I think David Perry is onto two comple=
tely =

different things. First of all, a suggestion was made for a small cirui=
t =

board for an nv net, possibly DIP, for breadboards, now it has snowball=
ed =

into small circuit boards a LOT like hextiles. I personally would prefe=
r =

small experimentation boards (but thats just my humble opinion), and =

use/modify the already existing hextiles. This would probably be easier=
and =

cheaper.

By the way, I was just wondering, is i=
t a =

violation of the patent to sell these =

boards????




Home