Alt-BEAM Archive
Message #04070
To: beam@sgiblab.sgi.com
From: Steven Bolt sbolt@xs4all.nl
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 22:07:25 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [alt-beam] Re: Unicore BeamAnt schematic!
On Mon, 31 May 1999, Chiu-Yuan Fang wrote:
> If you were to start experimenting with the BEAM Ant 6.X
> circuit...wouldn't you want to start at the level that MarkT is
> already at?
Sure. And to do that I'd need the pertinent schematic and
reasonable documentation, with the intended purpose/task/behaviour
on the first page(s).
> I know that Mark's solution probably isn't the "best" one
How can you tell in this case? Not even the problem was clearly
stated.
> but I like to experiment with his circuits and mechanical
> topologies then see if I can improve on them.
Which, of course, is fine - you may even have the 6.X circuit and
mechanical spec on screen at this very moment. But I don't, it
appears that few others have the privilege, and I fail to see the
point of discussing a circuit without having a look at the
schematic. Call me oldfashioned...
Best,
Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
# sbolt@xs4all.nl # Steven Bolt # popular science monthly KIJK #
----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/alt-beam
http://www.egroups.com
- Simplifying group communications
Home