Alt-BEAM Archive
Message #04061
To: beam@sgiblab.sgi.com
From: Chiu-Yuan Fang chiumanfu@home.com
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 09:35:39 -0700
Subject: [alt-beam] Re: Unicore BeamAnt schematic!
If you were to start experimenting with the BEAM Ant 6.X circuit...wouldn't you
want to start at the level that MarkT is already at? I know that Mark's
solution probably isn't the "best" one but I like to experiment with his
circuits and mechanical topologies then see if I can improve on them. That's my
personal preference and this subject is getting a little moldy so I'll leave it
at that.
Chiu
Steven Bolt wrote:
>
> Call me oldfashioned, but guessing at Mark T. circuitry, then
> building your guesswork to see what it does sounds kind of backward
> to me.
> Wouldn't it be more to the point to guess the purpose or task of
> BeamAnt Mk.x, see if you like it, possibly adjust the idea and then
> roll your own circuitry to achieve the purpose or task?
>
> Best,
>
> Steve
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> # sbolt@xs4all.nl # Steven Bolt # popular science monthly KIJK #
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Chiu-Yuan Fang
chiumanfu@home.com
ICQ=5614919
http://www.geocities.com/SouthBeach/6897/beam2.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/alt-beam
http://www.egroups.com
- Simplifying group communications
Home