Alt-BEAM Archive
Message #04032
To: "'beam@sgiblab.sgi.com'" beam@sgiblab.sgi.com
From: "van Zoelen, Bram SSI-TSEA-352" Bram.A.A.vanZoelen@is.shell.com
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 12:51:25 +0200
Subject: [alt-beam] Re: BEAM and machine evolution
Hi Terry,
[huge snip]
> I classify it as a cpu version of a
> classic beam design, and non-beam if speaking only about the electronics.
> But I don't care how others classify it, I do my own thing. Why? I bought
> a photopopper and thought it was really neat, but would be even neater if
> I could make one that backs up and learns. And there was a PIC chip so I
> used it. It worked, I'm happy, end of story. (I hope! :)
>
> Terry Newton
>
That's the point that i am trying to get to the list. I build just for my
own pleasure,
not to pleasure others on the list or to follow rules or guidelines set by
others.
I want to enjoy building and if i come up with something interesting for the
list
i will share it.
Bram
ps.
Any new developments?.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/alt-beam
http://www.egroups.com
- Simplifying group communications
Home