Alt-BEAM Archive
Message #03637
To: beam beam@corp.sgi.com
From: Richard Piotter richfile@rconnect.com
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 18:32:49 -0500
Subject: [alt-beam] Re: BEAM and machine evolution
JVernonM@aol.com wrote:
>
> Yes Wilf,
> I agree with all you've said. But I think the best way to advance any
> cerebral pursuit is through open debate. The list is the best forum for this.
> But debate is often mistaken for argument and bickering on the list,
> therefore negating any beneficial concessus. The very use of the list for
> this purpose is disputed by some. I never mean to insult or anger others, but
> that is the effect I seem to be having. This is most likely the fault of my
> own presentation. Anyway, it's just a waste of time. I need to get out to the
> shop and work on my latest creation. I still plan to try to help BEAM along
> through newbie pointers and development of kits and new approaches to
> marketing. But, that'll do. Thanks for the philosophy lesson. Now let's get
> back to that Star Wars string!
> Jim
Yeah! Those Roller bots were great, and like I said!!! we need to invent
force fields to protect our bots from young relatives! Hehe! (:
Richard Piotter
richfile@rconnect.com
The Richfiles Robotics & TI web page:
http://richfiles.calc.org
For the BEAM Robotics list:
BEAM Robotics Tek FAQ
http://people.ne.mediaone.net/bushbo/beam/FAQ.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/alt-beam
http://www.egroups.com
- Simplifying group communications
Home