Alt-BEAM Archive
Message #03142
To: Steven Bolt sbolt@xs4all.nl, beam@corp.sgi.com
From: Dave Hrynkiw dave@solarbotics.com
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 12:55:42 -0600
Subject: [alt-beam] Re: SMD SE
At 03:14 AM 5/10/1999 , Steven Bolt wrote:
>Wouldn't it be more elegant to trigger a monostable, instead of a
>latch with an off-level? That way you get a timed pulse, and reset
>would be achieved if the voltage dropped enough to unset the 1381,
>instead of all the way to 0.7V or so.
Yup, it would! But the SunDancer was kit number...3? There wasn't that much
alternate circuits developed at that point. But yes, a monostable would be
preferable in this application.
-Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------
"Um, no - that's H,R,Y,N,K,I,W. No, not K,I,U,U, K,I,_W_. Yes,
that's right. Yes, I know it looks like "HOCKYRINK." Yup, only
2 vowels. Pronounciation? _SMITH_".
http://www.solarbotics.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/group/alt-beam
http://www.eGroups.com
- Simplifying group communications
Home