Alt-BEAM Archive
Message #02419
To: dave@solarbotics.com
From: JVernonM@aol.com
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 03:06:31 EDT
Subject: [alt-beam] Re: Clarification
In a message dated 4/17/99 2:40:15 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
dave@solarbotics.com writes:
> Ok, it's a noble idea, but clearly define what you want to do. Exactly what
> sort of structured approach do you envision?
Many ideas have already been offered. Bob, Wilf, Bruce, and others have had
many insights as to how this can be pulled off. I have already stated what I
think would help.
> Personally, all I see that is lacking for the BEAM community is a clearly
> defined BEAM nomenclature/legend (or symbology) that Mark currently uses
to
> illustrate mechanical & electronic linkages. I know Richard Weait has
> already posted it on here ages ago, but I imagine it could use further
> clarification.
>
Dave, that's what I'm saying. If it takes Richard or someone else more
accepted then more power to them. I just saw a need.
> Again, this isn't meant as any sort of personal attack, I'm just trying to
> figure out what purpose the genome can fulfill that isn't already
addressed
> currently online.
Yes, of course.
Jim
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/alt-beam
Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com
Home