Alt-BEAM Archive
Message #02418
To: JVernonM@aol.com, beam@corp.sgi.com
From: Dave Hrynkiw dave@solarbotics.com
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 12:37:35 -0600
Subject: [alt-beam] Re: Clarification
At 12:07 AM 17/04/99 , JVernonM@aol.com wrote:
>I wanted to explain my perspective on this whole genome thing. I'm not saying
>anything new here. I'm not even using my own terms. The terms genome, living
>machines, robo-genetic stock, evolution, wild robot, are all Tilden's words.
>I simply thought a more structured approach to documenting those terms would
>give them more merit. And perhaps an easier path to achieving them.
Ok, it's a noble idea, but clearly define what you want to do. Exactly what
sort of structured approach do you envision?
Personally, all I see that is lacking for the BEAM community is a clearly
defined BEAM nomenclature/legend (or symbology) that Mark currently uses to
illustrate mechanical & electronic linkages. I know Richard Weait has
already posted it on here ages ago, but I imagine it could use further
clarification.
Again, this isn't meant as any sort of personal attack, I'm just trying to
figure out what purpose the genome can fulfill that isn't already addressed
currently online.
Regards,
Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------
"Um, no - that's H,R,Y,N,K,I,W. No, not K,I,U,U, K,I,_W_. Yes,
that's right. Yes, I know it looks like "HOCKYRINK." Yup, only
2 vowels. Pronounciation? _SMITH_".
http://www.solarbotics.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/alt-beam
Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com
Home