Alt-BEAM Archive
Message #02416
To: JVernonM@aol.com
From: Dave Hrynkiw dave@solarbotics.com
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 12:20:34 -0600
Subject: [alt-beam] Re: Beam genome - waste of time....
At 10:55 PM 16/04/99 , JVernonM@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 4/16/99 10:43:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>dave@solarbotics.com writes:
>> It doesn't matter if a genome would be possible, practical, or appreciated.
>
>Appreciated is a little harsh there Dave.
Fair enough - consider it withdrawn.
>Think of what would happen to the
>population of these beasties if Beckingham's approach to methodology
>multiplied by 10 or 20 fold. That's only one example of how designs innovate
>the approach. All I'm suggesting is a method to realize and document those
>approaches.
But aren't the methodologies already documented on Beckingham's & Fang's
websites? I don't see what the genome does to make what is already online
any better.
If I'm missing something in the whole genome argument, please summarize it
in one or two sentences....
Regards,
Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------
"Um, no - that's H,R,Y,N,K,I,W. No, not K,I,U,U, K,I,_W_. Yes,
that's right. Yes, I know it looks like "HOCKYRINK." Yup, only
2 vowels. Pronounciation? _SMITH_".
http://www.solarbotics.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/alt-beam
Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com
Home