Alt-BEAM Archive
Message #02389
To: Wilf.Rigter@powertech.bc.ca
From: JVernonM@aol.com
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 05:57:25 EDT
Subject: [alt-beam] Re: Beam genome
In a message dated 4/15/99 11:04:14 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
Wilf.Rigter@powertech.bc.ca writes:
> At first glance writing a Beam genealogy could be quite problematic,
> defining which came first, who invented it, what it was derived from. It
> would require a consensus of the historical time line (or time tree)
showing
> the creators, genotype, phenotype and evolutionary links of all BEAM
devices
> from pre-Beam to the present.
>
Actually, I think most of that can be found online if you take a lot of time
to surf it all. Paul Beckingham actually spurred the idea in my mind because
of the way he set up his site. He has started a documentation of his ideas
and some others have followed suit. I still believe however, that a single
source of these facts and others would make it easier for the novice as well
as the advanced to access it all. As well as a platform to promote
involvement. Paul, what are your thoughts on this? I've been using your name
in vain for some time now. It would also present those sets of guidelines
needed to improve the body electric.
Jim
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/alt-beam
Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com
Home