Alt-BEAM Archive
Message #02385
To: Wilf.Rigter@powertech.bc.ca
From: JVernonM@aol.com
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 05:02:22 EDT
Subject: [alt-beam] Re: Beam genome
In a message dated 4/15/99 11:04:14 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
Wilf.Rigter@powertech.bc.ca writes:
> the state of the art of BEAM (c) and BEAM (like) ideas/devices/systems as it
> relates to this group.
I overlooked the distinction the first time. Yes, a separation of the two
would be beneficial in more ways than one. A "as one relates to the other"
approach would be more accepted than a compilation. It would be kinda like
trying to stick your chocolate into their peanut butter. The result is tasty,
but they are gonna resent it. This is where I always take that side road of
BEAM the philosophy verses BEAM the trademark. But don't worry those of you
whom I don't know and often speak of in third person, I ain't goin' there!
Jim
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/alt-beam
Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com
Home