Alt-BEAM Archive
Message #01000
To: ian@beam-online.com
From: "Pete McCarthy" dilbertpete@hotmail.com
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 15:40:44 PST
Subject: [alt-beam] Re: comp.robotics.beam??
Hello Ian,
In response to your e-amil, I have posted some remarks to your thoughts
>From owner-beam-outgoing@corp.sgi.com Tue Feb 23 20:10:38 1999
>Received: from relay1.corp.sgi.com (spindle.corp.sgi.com
[198.29.75.13]) by deliverator.sgi.com
(980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id SAA23048;
Tue, 23 Feb 1999 18:26:51 -0800 (PST)
> mail_from (owner-beam-outgoing@corp.sgi.com)
>Received: (from majordom@localhost) by relay1.corp.sgi.com
(980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id SAA41479 for beam-outgoing; Tue,
23 Feb 1999 18:26:38 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by
relay1.corp.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id
SAA73171 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 1999 18:26:36 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from intergate.etsc.net (intergate.etsc.net [205.231.182.2])
> by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam:
> SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary
> systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email
> from the Internet.)
> via ESMTP id SAA09334
> for ; Tue, 23 Feb 1999 18:26:35 -0800 (PST)
> mail_from (synet@beam-online.com)
>Received: from [172.17.250.43] ([172.17.250.43])
> by intergate.etsc.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id TAA25107;
> Tue, 23 Feb 1999 19:20:14 -0700 (MST)
>Message-Id: <199902240220.TAA25107@intergate.etsc.net>
>Subject: RE: comp.robotics.beam??
>Date: Tue, 23 Feb 99 19:24:06 -0700
>x-sender: synet@beam-online.com
>x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0, March 15, 1997
>From: Ian Bernstein
>To: "Pete McCarthy" ,
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>Sender: owner-beam@corp.sgi.com
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: Ian Bernstein
>
>>Well, some benefits are:
>>1. it won't clog up your e-mail address
>>2. With over several thousand beamers out there, I feel that the
mailing
>>list is inadequate to serve everyone
>>3. Beam will finally get a newsgroup of its own instead of having to
>>filter through all of comp.robotics.misc posts for ones pertaining to
>>beam
>>
>>Let me ask you something, what are the drawbacks of having this
>>newsgroup??
>Let me just add my .02 cents.
>The mailing list has been around for like 4 years and has lots of
>subscribers (like 400 or something) and I don't think everyone will
just
>switch over. I also don't think very many people (including me) have
the
>time and whatever to look at "both" the list and the newsgroup so I
think
>it will just die out.
>
It's not going to be a rapid change (or at least I hope its not). With
a change this big, I am planning to not take action until around a month
from now, maybe two (plenty of time) Until then, I think I'll answer my
E-mail, and schedule at least one debate (on a chat server).
>Just my option
Yes, it is your opinion, and I respect it
>
>*-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-*
>Ian Bernstein "aka - Synet" The Master Builder
>
>E-Mail - Ian@beam-online.com
>BEAM Online - http://www.beam-online.com
>Quote - A synonym is a word you use when you can't spell
> the word you thought of first
>
>
______________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/alt-beam
Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com
Home