Alt-BEAM Archive
Message #00084
To: dennison dennlill@buffnet.net
From: "John A. deVries II" zozzles@lanl.gov
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 12:16:29 -0700
Subject: [alt-beam] Re: BEAM classification
At 11:07 AM 2/1/99 -0500, dennison wrote:
>I'd agree, anything remote controlled doesn't count.
By your definition, then, the robot described by Mark Tilden's patent isn't
beam: it has an IR receiver that allows you to _remotely_ induce more
processes into the main loop.
Offhand, I think there are at least as many definitions of "BEAM" as there
are readers of this list and as a result you'll never achieve anything
approaching consensus.
Zoz
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/alt-beam
Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com
Home